The following comprises a series of essays written in response to a discussion held on the Message Board of this web site. The discussion, between a young creationist, Rob, and several other regular contributors, eventually came to the issue of radio isotope dating. Rob mentioned that Steve Austin’s Grand Canyon dating experiment cast doubt on the viability of absolute dating systems. Naturally the notion was rebuffed and respondents pointed to articles heavily critical of the YEC experiment. Wanting to hear both sides of the issue, Rob wrote to Answers in Genesis, highlighting some particular lines written by Chris Stassen in an article critical of Austin’s Canyon work. The relevant lines were:. The conditions which caused the “false isochron” in this case are fairly well-understood, and easy to avoid by proper sample selection. In fact, the resulting age in this case is meaningful and probably accurate.
Roger C. Wiens has a PhD in Physics, with a minor in Geology. His PhD thesis was on isotope ratios in meteorites, including surface exposure dating. First edition ; revised version Radiometric dating–the process of determining the age of rocks from the decay of their radioactive elements–has been in widespread use for over half a century.
origins compared to Genesis. One such site for this kind of exchange is Talk Origins, which claims to sponsor Radiometric Dating Methods- in Detail.
Creation science or scientific creationism is a pseudoscience , a form of creationism presented without obvious Biblical language but with the claim that special creation and flood geology based on the Genesis creation narrative in the Book of Genesis have validity as science. Historians,  philosophers of science and skeptics have described creation science as a pseudoscientific attempt to map the Bible into scientific facts.
Creation science began in the s, as a fundamentalist Christian effort in the United States to prove Biblical inerrancy and nullify the scientific evidence for evolution. The creation science texts and curricula that first emerged in the s focused upon concepts derived from a literal interpretation of the Bible and were overtly religious in nature, most notably linking Noah’s flood in the Biblical Genesis account to the geological and fossil record.
These works attracted little notice beyond the schools and congregations of conservative fundamental and Evangelical Christians until the s, when its followers challenged the teaching of evolution in the public schools and other venues in the United States, bringing it to the attention of the public-at-large and the scientific community. Many school boards and lawmakers were persuaded to include the teaching of creation science alongside evolution in the science curriculum.
The ruling in McLean v. Arkansas found that creation science fails to meet the essential characteristics of science and that its chief intent is to advance a particular religious view. In response to this ruling, drafts of the creation science school textbook Of Pandas and People were edited to change references of creation to intelligent design before its publication in
C14-L on [email protected]
Antievolutionists often express outrage over alleged incivility from those who oppose their efforts to evade the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But they have no difficulty in dishing out the abuse themselves. Here is a sample from the Invidious Comparisons thread that documents egregious behavior on the part of the religious antievolution advocates. These critics include embryologists, paleontologists, biochemists, molecular biologists, medical doctors, philosophers, and even lawyers.
Unfortunately, the North American science-and-religion establishment has largely turned a deaf ear to these critics, preferring instead to abandon classical theology and embrace metaphysical materialism and moral relativism.
The s archive is a collection of articles and essays, most of which have dating methods rely on the assumptions of non- contamination and constant.
Voting for the RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees election is underway! The evidence against a recent creation is overwhelming. This article collects evidences that place a lower limit on the age of the Universe beyond the 6, to 10, years asserted by most Young Earth creationists YECs and the literalist Ussher chronology. All of this evidence supports deep time : the idea, considered credible by scientists since the early s, that the Earth and the Universe is millions [note 1] or billions of years old.
Modern science accepts that the Earth is about 4. These limits usually take the form: “Because we observe [X], which occurs at rate [Y], the universe must be at least [Z] years old”. There are three standard creationist responses: First, creationists assert that current rates Y are different than past rates. It is possible that these rates changed — but under uniformitarianism , which is necessary for science to function, we must assume that rates did not change unless there is evidence for this change.
Second, creationists appeal to the Omphalos hypothesis and argue that God deceptively created the world to appear old. This is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, and is unscientific.
Mona Khazindar and Maysaloun Faraj talk origins, politics and symbolism
Do you have an item you would like to have dated? For Research Professionals Please scroll down on this page for links to computer programs. SIRI update. VIRI consensus values. Computer Programs.
The primary dating methods that are used by secular scientists to show that the skeptical claims from an article by Mark Isaac on TalkOrigins, an evolutionary.
Cliches and expressions give us many wonderful figures of speech and words in the English language, as they evolve via use and mis-use alike. Many cliches and expressions – and words – have fascinating and surprising origins, and many popular assumptions about meanings and derivations are mistaken. These cliches, words and expressions origins and derivations illustrate the ever-changing complexity of language and communications, and are ideal free materials for word puzzles or quizzes, and team-building games.
Cliches and expressions are listed alphabetically according to their key word, for example, ‘save your bacon’ is listed under ‘b’ for bacon. Some expressions with two key words are listed under each word. A commonly ignored reference source for many words and expressions origins – especially for common cliches that are not listed in slang and expressions dictionaries – is simply to use an ordinary decent English dictionary Oxford English Dictionary or Websters, etc , which will provide origins for most words and many related phrases see the ‘strong relief’ example below.
The money slang section contains money slang and word origins and meanings, and English money history. The portmanteau words entry is a particularly interesting example of one of the very many different ways in which language evolves. The close relationship between society and language – especially the influence of French words in English history – is also fascinating, and this connection features in many words and expressions origins.
Radiocarbon Dating & Calibration
Launch map. Output includes the KY county and KY , quadrangle where the coordinate is located and links to map views. Launch tool. Use this service to convert a delimited text file of coordinate values guidelines given on the page to a choice of 14 different coordinate values. Output is the same text file with the converted values and the KY county and KY , quadrangle where a coordinate is located.
Origins Archive); Darwin, Charles: The Origin of Species (th edition; Online Accuracy of Fossils and Dating Methods (short article that presents evidence in origins); Biology and Evolutionary Theory (maintained by the talk.origins.
Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years.
They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods. This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters. Answer: Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen N into carbon C or radiocarbon.
Living organisms are constantly incorporating this C into their bodies along with other carbon isotopes. When the organisms die, they stop incorporating new C, and the old C starts to decay back into N by emitting beta particles. The older an organism’s remains are, the less beta radiation it emits because its C is steadily dwindling at a predictable rate.
Other Links:. Former creationist Glenn Morton examines several famous young-earth creationist arguments and provides data to illustrate their flaws. A Radiometric Dating Resource List. Tim Thompson has collected a large set of links to web pages that discuss radiometric dating techniques and the age of the earth controversy. This value is derived from several different lines of evidence.
This is not so with websites such as the three main assumptions involved in all radiometric or radioisotope dating methods.
Science in Christian Perspective. Radiometric Dating. A Christian Perspective. Roger C. Wiens has a PhD in Physics, with a minor in Geology. His PhD thesis was on isotope ratios in meteorites, including surface exposure dating. Radiometric dating–the process of determining the age of rocks from the decay of their radioactive elements–has been in widespread use for over half a century. There are over forty such techniques, each using a different radioactive element or a different way of measuring them.
It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture in which the Earth was created a very long time ago.